Harun Yahya
 

 

 
.....:::::::::: Web Sites ::::::::::.....
Harun Yahya

Transitional Form Dilemma

The idea of evolution, which materialists  ever since Ancient Greece have employed to account for the origin of life, entered the world of science in the 19th century with Charles Darwin’s book On the Origin of Species. Those who supported the materialist philosophy, which underwent an enormous rise during the 19th century, adopted the theory of evolution as an answer to the question of how life came into being, but did not question the theory’s scientific foundations. The proponents of materialist ideologies imposed the theory of evolution on entire systems of education and popular culture for 150 years, despite possessing no evidence for it, and employing only methods of propaganda.

From the second half of the 20th century onward, however, the privileged position that the theory of evolution had enjoyed among the scientific community became increasingly problematic. Observations and experiments in a wide range of scientific disciplines, from paleontology to biology and from anatomy to genetics, began to produce findings that argued against the theory. In the face of these new scientific findings, evolutionists suddenly found themselves and their theory on the defensive.

One of the main objections to Darwin’s theory of evolution indeed, concerns the fossil record. The transitional forms that evolutionists expected to find in the fossil record— and which might be regarded as proof that species evolved from one another—have not been found. Fossils emerge suddenly and with all their particular features fully present, and the fossil record demonstrates that no species experienced any process of gradual change leading to its eventual disappearance.

The absence of transitional forms from the fossil record is by itself sufficient to undermine the whole theory of evolution. Charles Darwin, the founder of the theory, actually admitted the truth of this! After inquiring into the absence of such forms, he wrote that “this, perhaps is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory.”

And today, even among evolutionists, there is a serious dispute over how to interpret the fossil record. Fossils, one important source of scientific evidence regarding natural history, clearly refute the theory of evolution and show that life on Earth appeared suddenly, with no evolutionary process behind it—in other words that life forms were created.

Jun 03, 2008

Harun Yahya - Web Sites Click for All Web Sites
Transitional Form Dilemma  (URL) -
Please write your comment for this work
Post To MySpace!  
   
   


 Other Languages
Evrim Masalı (Türkçe) 
Arageçiş Açmazı (Türkçe) 

.....:::::::::: Related Works ::::::::::.....
 Books
THE TRANSITIONAL FORM DILEMMA  
.....:::::::::: Related Works in Same Category ::::::::::.....
200th Anniversary of Darwinism's Collapse Ambers Deny Darwin
Ask Darwinists Atlas of Creation
Baltic Ambers BBC Refuted
Bird Fossils Burmese Ambers
Cambrian and Darwin Comments on Atlas of Creation
Confessions of the Evolutionists Cries of Darwinism
Darwinism in Ruins Darwinism is So 19th Century
Darwinism Refuted Darwinism: the Greatest Lie in History
Darwinism - Watch Darwinist Dishonesty
Darwinist Panic Darwinist Panic in France
Darwinists Ask Us Darwinists in a Pinch
Darwinists in Pain Darwinists Never Realize
Darwin's Lost Cause Details of Darwinist Forgeries
Dominican Ambers Evolution Deceit
Evolution Documentary Evolution is not Scientific
Evolution Tale Famous Darwinist Deceptions
Fossil - Museum Grieving Darwinists
Living - Fossils National Academy of Sciences Refuted
Oldest Mushroom Quran Denies Darwinism
Reply to Dawkins Reptile Fossils
The Collapse of Atheism The Skulls that Demolish Darwin
The Stone Age What Darwin Did Not Know?
Why Darwin Was Wrong?  
 
 
 
 
  BookGlobal.Net